Boger v. Doe et al
3:2020cv00307 |
August 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
South Bend Office |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 OPINION AND ORDER: The court DISMISSES Stephen Boger's federal claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A because the amended complaint does not state a federal claim for which relief can be granted, and DISMISSES Stephen Boger's state law claims against his cellmate, Charly John Doe, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 9/10/2020. (bas) |
Filing 18 OPINION AND ORDER DIRECTING the clerk to place this cause number on a blank Prisoner Complaint form Pro Se 14 (INND Rev. 2/20) and send it to Stephen Boger; and GRANTING Steven Boger until 9/7/2020, to file an amended complaint on that form. If Mr. Boger doesnt respond by that deadline, his claims based on the Eighth Amendment will be dismissed without further notice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A because the current complaint does not state a federal claim on which relief can be granted, and any state law claims will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 8/6/2020. (Copy mailed as directed in Order)(mrm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Boger v. Doe et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.