Williams v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
| Kyle F Williams |
| Norfolk Southern Railway Company |
| 3:2020cv00343 |
| April 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Robert L Miller |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER re #9 On courts own motion the telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference is reset for 7/28/2020 11:00 AM in US District Court - South Bend before Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch Sr.. Approved by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 6/9/20. (slm)
|
| Filing 10 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. (slm) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER Joint Proposed Discovery due by 6/29/2020. Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 7/27/2020 11:00 AM in US District Court - South Bend before Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch Sr.. Dial-in instructions to be provided to the parties by email. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 6/8/20. (slm)
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Norfolk Southern Railway Company.(Duffey, John) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. Norfolk Southern Railway Company waiver sent on 5/6/2020, answer due 7/6/2020. (Duffey, John) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Duffey, John) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by John C Duffey on behalf of Norfolk Southern Railway Company (Duffey, John) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Heather L Emenhiser on behalf of Norfolk Southern Railway Company (Emenhiser, Heather) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Norfolk Southern Railway Company. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (mrm) |
| Judge Robert L Miller, Jr and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (NEW CASE) (mrm) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin J Wilensky on behalf of Kyle F Williams (Wilensky, Benjamin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Norfolk Southern Railway Company( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-4213634.), filed by Kyle F Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Pearlman, Arvin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company | |
| Represented By: | Heather L Emenhiser |
| Represented By: | John C Duffey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kyle F Williams | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin J Wilensky |
| Represented By: | Arvin J Pearlman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
