Mace v. Ray
| Candace Mace |
| John Ray and John Ray doing business as 7-11 Corporation |
| 3:2020cv00412 |
| May 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Damon R Leichty |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to #1 Complaint against John E. Ray Acknowledgement filed by Candace Mace. (McQuary, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel H Pfeifer on behalf of Candace Mace (Pfeifer, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 6
Summons Issued as to John Ray. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (nal)
|
|
Filing 5
Civil Cover Sheet by Candace Mace. (McQuary, Jeffrey)
|
|
Judge Damon R Leichty and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. NEW CASE. (nal)
|
|
Filing 4
Proposed Summons filed by Candace Mace. (McQuary, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 3
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Candace Mace. (McQuary, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey S McQuary on behalf of Candace Mace (McQuary, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against John Ray( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-4230777.), filed by Candace Mace. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(McQuary, Jeffrey)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
