McClure v Doctor et al
| William McClure |
| Doctor, Nurse Practitioner and Mark Savior |
| 3:2020cv00501 |
| June 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Damon R Leichty |
| Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Initial Partial Filing fee: $ 11.45, receipt number 3025057 (nae) |
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTS the plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 ; ORDERS the plaintiff, William McClure, IDOC # 263276, to immediately pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) $11.45 to the clerk in payment of the initial partial filing fee; ORDERS the plaintiff to pay to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTS the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; and DIRECTS the clerk to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 6/22/2020. (Copy mailed to pro se party and Warden)(lhc)
|
| Filing 7 Case transferred in from District of Indiana Southern; Case Number 1:20-cv-01629. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Filing 6 Transfer Letter to Clerk of the Northern District of Indiana. Case transferred electronically to Northern District of Indiana, on June 17, 2020. (JDH) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 6/17/2020.] |
|
Filing 5
CLOSED TRANSFER - ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA, SOUTH BEND DIVISION - This action is based on events that occurred at WCF, which is in LaPorte County, Indiana. LaPorte County lies in the South Bend Division of the Northern District of Indiana. 28 U.S.C. 94(a)(2). Additionally, the complaint indicates that all the defendants all reside in the Northern District. "For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought or to any district or division to which all parties have consented." 28 U.S.C. 1404. This action is therefore TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana at South Bend, Indiana. (See Order). Copy to William McClure via U.S. mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/17/2020.(JDH) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 6/17/2020.]
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 6/17/2020.] |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 6/17/2020.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff WILLIAM MCCLURE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (AKH) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 6/17/2020.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DOCTOR, NURSE PRACTITIONER, MARK SAVIOR, filed by WILLIAM MCCLURE. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Envelope). (AKH) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 6/17/2020.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
