Bennett v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: James Clifford Bennett
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court: SSA (Court Use Only)
Case Number: 3:2020cv00540
Filed: June 25, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Philip P Simon
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathleen T Trzyna - AUSA on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Trzyna - AUSA, Kathleen)
August 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by USMS obo James Clifford Bennett. Commissioner of Social Security served on 7/27/2020. US Attorney General served on 7/27/2020. US Attorney served on 7/28/2020, answer due 9/28/2020.(jld)
June 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTE: The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. (Copy to USM). (nal)
June 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The filing fee is WAIVED and the United States Marshals Service is directed to effect service of process on the defendant. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 6/29/20. (Copy to USM). (nal)
June 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Judge Philip P Simon added. NEW CASE, MOTION PENDING. (kjp)
June 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason S Rodman on behalf of James Clifford Bennett (Rodman, Jason)
June 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Randal S Forbes on behalf of James Clifford Bennett (Forbes, Randal)
June 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff James Clifford Bennett. (Forbes, Randal)
June 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT to Review Decision of Commissioner of Social Security Administration against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by James Clifford Bennett. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Notice of Unfavorable ALJ Decision, #2 Exhibit B Notice of Appeals Council Action, #3 Exhibit C Motion to Continue Hearings/Motion to Extend Time for Deadlines, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Proposed Summons)(Forbes, Randal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bennett v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Kathleen T Trzyna - AUSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Clifford Bennett
Represented By: Randal S Forbes
Represented By: Jason S Rodman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: SSA (Court Use Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?