Eckes - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO DOCUMENTS v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
Plaintiff: Austin Eckes and Austin Lee Eckes
Defendant: Indiana Department of Corrections, John R Harvil and Westville Correctional Center
Case Number: 3:2020cv00544
Filed: June 25, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: South Bend Office
Presiding Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Referring Judge: Damon R Leichty
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2020 Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed as to #5 Opinion and Order, #6 Clerks Judgment, and #7 Amended Opinion and Order. (lhc)
June 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A because it does not state a claim for which relief can be granted; DENYING Austin Eckes leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 ; ORDERING the plaintiff, Austin Eckes, IDOC # 228699, to pay (and the facility having custody of him to automatically remit) to the clerk of this court 20% of the money he receives for each calendar month during which he receives $10.00 or more, until the $400.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTING the clerk of court to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; DIRECTING the clerk to return, unfiled, any papers filed in any cases by or on behalf of Austin Eckes (except for a notice of appeal or unless filed in a criminal or habeas corpus proceeding) until he has paid in full all outstanding fees and sanctions in all civil actions in any federal court; DIRECTING the clerk to note on the docket of this case any attempted filings in violation of this order; and DIRECTING the clerk to ensure that a copy of this order is mailed to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 6/29/2020. (Copy mailed to pro se party by certified mail 7001 1140 0003 1354 2626 and as directed in Order)(bas) (bas)
June 29, 2020 Filing 6 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party by certified mail 7001 1140 0003 1354 2626) (bas)
June 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A because it does not state a claim for which relief can be granted; DENYING Austin Eckes leave to proceed in forma pauperis; ORDERING the plaintiff, Austin Eckes, IDOC # 228699, to pay (and the facility having custody of him to automatically remit) to the clerk of this court 20% of the money he receives for each calendar month during which he receives $10.00 or more, until the $400.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTING the clerk of court to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; DIRECTING the clerk to note on the docket of this case any attempted filings in violation of this order; and DIRECTING the clerk to ensure that a copy of this order is mailed to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 6/29/2020. (Copy mailed to pro se party by certified mail 7001 1140 0003 1354 2626 and as directed in Order)(bas) Modified on 6/29/2020 to add certified mail # (bas).
June 25, 2020 Filing 4 Plaintiff's First REQUEST for Production of Documents by Austin Eckes.(nae)
June 25, 2020 Filing 3 Plaintiff's First REQUEST for Admissions by Austin Eckes.(nae)
June 25, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Austin Eckes. (nae)
June 25, 2020 Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against John R Harvil, Indiana Department of Corrections, Westville Correctional Center, filed by Austin Eckes. (Returned file stamped copy with case number to Eckes) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Declaration 1, #3 Declaration 2, #4 Proposed summons and USm 285 forms, #5 Envelope)(nae)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eckes - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO DOCUMENTS v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Austin Eckes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Austin Lee Eckes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Indiana Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John R Harvil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Westville Correctional Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?