Akins v. Commissioner of Social Security
Wanda Akins |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA (Court Use Only) |
3:2020cv00564 |
July 1, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Philip P Simon |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathleen T Trzyna - AUSA on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Trzyna - AUSA, Kathleen) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTE: The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. (mlc) |
Judge Philip P Simon added. (NEW CASE) (mlc) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason S Rodman on behalf of Wanda Akins (Rodman, Jason) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Randal S Forbes on behalf of Wanda Akins (Forbes, Randal) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR MANDAMUS TO REQUIRE THE COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO HOLD A HEARING (PRESIDED BY A CONSTITUTIONALLY APPOINTED ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE) IN RELATION TO THE DENIAL PLAINTIFFS DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS APPLICATION against Commissioner of Social Security( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-4269810.), filed by Wanda Akins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Notice of ALJ Unfavorable Decision, #2 Exhibit B Notice of Appeals Council Decision, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons)(Forbes, Randal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.