Hynek v. Futch et al
| Andrew Hynek |
| James Futch and J&J Driveaway Systems, LLC |
| 3:2020cv00704 |
| August 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 AMENDED DOCUMENT by J&J Driveaway Systems, LLC. Amendment to #1 Notice of Removal, . (Ehrhardt, Thomas) |
Filing 6
ORDER: Defendants are ORDERED to file an amended notice of removal, by 9/25/2020, that properly alleges the citizenship of each party to this action as outlined in Order. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 9/10/2020. (mrm)
|
| Filing 4 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint by James Futch, J&J Driveaway Systems, LLC.(Ehrhardt, Thomas) |
| Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (NEW CASE) (bas) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Charles F Albrecht on behalf of All Defendants (Albrecht, Charles) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas S Ehrhardt on behalf of All Defendants (Ehrhardt, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-4316932.) from LaPorte Superior Court, Cause No. 46D02-2007-CT-000999, filed by J&J Driveaway Systems, LLC, James Futch. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Ehrhardt, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
