Keel v. Warden
Petitioner: Jason Andrew Keel and Jason Keel
Respondent: Warden
Not Classified By Court: WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Case Number: 3:2020cv00950
Filed: November 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Jon E DeGuilio
Referring Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2020 Filing 7 Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 3025958. (kms)
November 30, 2020 Filing 6 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (mrm)
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING #2 MOTION to Amend/Correct; DENYING as unnecessary #3 MOTION to Expedite; DISMISSING without prejudice the amended petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases because the claim is unexhausted; DENYING Jason Andrew Keel a certificate of appealability pursuant to Section 2254 Habeas Corpus Rule 11; and DIRECTING the Clerk to close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 11/30/2020. (mrm)
November 30, 2020 Filing 4 Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by Jason Andrew Keel. Pursuant to General Order 2018-1, documents submitted to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (kms)
November 24, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION to Expedite the Proceedings by Petitioner Jason Andrew Keel. (nae)
November 24, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION to Amend #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Jason Andrew Keel. (Attachments: #1 Amended Petition, #2 Exhibits, #3 Letter to Clerk re: filing fee)(nae)
November 10, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jason Andrew Keel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(No filing fee or IFP received)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Keel)(kms)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Keel v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jason Andrew Keel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jason Keel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?