Moody v. Indiana Department of Correction
Plaintiff: Klorissa Moody
Defendant: Indiana Department of Correction
Case Number: 3:2020cv00953
Filed: November 12, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Referring Judge: Damon R Leichty
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Indiana Department of Correction.(Pope, Adrienne)
December 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Cameron S Huffman on behalf of Indiana Department of Correction (Huffman, Cameron)
December 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Cameron S Huffman on behalf of Indiana Department of Correction (Huffman, Cameron) ***FILING ERROR; ATTORNEY NOTIFIED TO REFILE; REFILED AT #9 *** Modified on 12/14/2020 (ace). Modified on 12/16/2020 (ace).
December 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines: Per DE #7 Indiana Department of Correction answer due 1/7/2021 (nae)
December 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by Indiana Department of Correction ; answer due by January 7, 2021. (Pope, Adrienne)
December 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Adrienne Pope on behalf of Indiana Department of Correction (Pope, Adrienne)
November 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Klorissa Moody. Indiana Department of Correction served on 11/19/2020, answer due 12/10/2020. (Haskin, John)
November 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Indiana Department of Correction. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (bas)
November 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Judge Damon R Leichty and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (NEW CASE) (bas)
November 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Keenan D Wilson on behalf of Klorissa Moody (Wilson, Keenan)
November 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John H Haskin on behalf of Klorissa Moody (Haskin, John)
November 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Indiana Department of Correction( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-4396650.), filed by Klorissa Moody. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Haskin, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moody v. Indiana Department of Correction
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Indiana Department of Correction
Represented By: Adrienne Pope
Represented By: Cameron S Huffman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Klorissa Moody
Represented By: Keenan D Wilson
Represented By: John H Haskin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?