Ybarra v. Warden
| Randy Russell Ybarra and Randy Ybarra |
| Warden |
| 3:2021cv00037 |
| January 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (bas) |
Filing 4
OPINION AND ORDER: The court DENIES the habeas corpus petition pursuant to Section 2254 Habeas Corpus Rule 4; DIRECTS the clerk to enter judgment; DENIES the Petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal; and DIRECTS the clerk to fax or email a copy of this order and the petition (ECF #1 at 1-3) to both the Indiana State Prison Warden and the Indiana Department of Correction. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 1/19/2021. (Copy mailed to pro se party and Email to Indiana State Prison and IDOC with Order, Petition, and Clerk's Judgment)(bas)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION Requesting an Immediate Emergency Hearing Telecommunications Court to Provide Emergency Protection by Petitioner Randy Russell Ybarra. (rmc) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Randy Russell Ybarra. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(return file-stamped copy w/case number)(rmc) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Randy Russell Ybarra. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Trust Account Ledger, #2 Envelope)(rmc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
