Rettelle v. Moore
| Bruce Chip Rettelle and Bruce Rettelle |
| Kyle Moore |
| 3:2021cv00185 |
| March 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Damon R Leichty |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (bas) |
Filing 3
ORDER: This action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 5/10/2021. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(bas)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER GRANTING Mr. Rettelle until 4/21/2021, to file an amended complaint that addresses the issues described in this order and GRANTING Mr. Rettelle until 4/21/2021, to either pay the filing fee or file an in forma pauperis petition accompanied by his trust fund ledgers for the past six months and CAUTIONING him that if he does not respond by the deadline, the case will be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 3/22/2021. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mrm)
|
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Kyle Moore, filed by Bruce Chip Rettelle. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(No filing fee or IFP received)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Rettelle)(kms) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
