LaMar v. Neal et al
Plaintiff: Kha'wann LaMar
Defendant: T Lenover, Wexford and Ron Neal
Case Number: 3:2021cv00248
Filed: April 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Jon E DeGuilio
Referring Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; ORDERING Khawann LaMar, also known as Khawann Lamar, IDOC # 233704, to immediately pay $8.43 to the Clerk in payment of the initial partial filing fee; ORDERING Plaintiff to pay to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; and DIRECTING the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds and to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 5/19/2021. (Copy mailed to pro se and ISP Inmate Trust Fund Acct. as directed in Order)(mrm)
May 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Kha'wann LaMar. (nae)
May 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Wexford, filed by Kha'wann LaMar. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(nae)
April 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER STRIKING #1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against T Lenover, Ron Neal, Wexford, filed by Kha'wann LaMar. GRANTING the plaintiff until 5/14/2021, to file an amended complaint containing only related claims, and to pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis; and CAUTIONING him that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case is subject to dismissal without further notice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 4/13/2021. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mrm)
April 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 **STRICKEN pursuant to DE #2 Order** PRO SE COMPLAINT against T Lenover, Ron Neal, Wexford, filed by Kha'wann LaMar. (NO IFP or Filing Fee) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(jld)(copy sent to Pltf) Modified on 4/13/2021 to strike (mrm).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LaMar v. Neal et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T Lenover
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wexford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ron Neal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kha'wann LaMar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?