Keplinger v. Doe
Curtis D Keplinger |
John Doe |
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only) |
3:2021cv00249 |
April 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Michael G Gotsch |
Damon R Leichty |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by Curtis D Keplinger. Pursuant to General Order 2018-1, documents submitted to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (nae) |
Filing 3 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (mrm) |
Filing 2 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING #1 MOTION for Extension of Time to File, filed by Curtis D Keplinger and DIRECTING the clerk to close this case. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 4/19/2021. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mrm) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Extension of Time by Plaintiff Curtis D Keplinger. (File stamped 4/5/2021, received by E-file 4/12/21) (Returned copy with case number to Keplinger, no filing fee or IFP received) (nae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.