Sanchez v. Indiana Dept Child Services
Mario J Sanchez |
LaPorte County Jail and Indiana Dept Child Services |
3:2021cv00306 |
April 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Jon E DeGuilio |
Michael G Gotsch |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 8 Initial Partial Filing fee received: $ 25.33, receipt number 3027100. (kms) |
Filing 9 *STRICKEN*(Unsigned) Letter from Mario Sanchez re: filing fee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (kms) Modified on 6/21/2021 to strike per #10 order. (kms) |
Filing 7 Letter from Mario Sanchez re: case. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Sent docket sheet to Sanchez)(kms) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Indiana Dept Child Services, filed by Mario J Sanchez. (added pursuant to 321cv390 DE 3)(mrm) |
![]() |
Filing 4 (unsigned) Letter from Mario Sanchez asking to dismiss case against county jail and go after Child Services, received without case number. (nae) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Mario J Sanchez. (nae) |
![]() |
Filing 1 (Unsigned) PRO SE COMPLAINT against LaPorte County Jail, filed by Mario J Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(No filing fee or IFP received)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Sanchez)(kms) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.