Hudson v. Miami Correctional Facility et al
Joel Hudson |
Miami Correctional Facility, Baker and Myers |
3:2021cv00314 |
May 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Michael G Gotsch |
Robert L Miller |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; ORDERING Joel Hudson, IDOC # 280684 to immediately pay $55.51 to the clerk in payment of the initial partial filing fee; ORDERING Plaintiff to pay to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; and DIRECTING the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds and to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 6/28/2021. (Copy mailed to pro se party and Miami CF as directed in order)(mrm) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Joel Hudson. (kms) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Baker, Miami Correctional Facility, Myers, filed by Joel Hudson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Hudson)(kms) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.