Salyer v. 11659073 Canada Inc. et al
Patton Salyer |
Palak S. Kuldeep, 11659073 Canada Inc. and Kuldeep S. Palak |
3:2021cv00324 |
May 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Jon E DeGuilio |
Michael G Gotsch |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Answers due for all defendants on 7/12/2021 per #3 and #5 Waivers of service. (jld) |
Filing 5 WAIVER by Kuldeep S. Palak of the Service of Summons. (Williams, James) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by James R Williams on behalf of 11659073 Canada Inc., Kuldeep S. Palak (Williams, James) |
Filing 3 WAIVER by 11659073 Canada Inc. of the Service of Summons. (Williams, James) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to 11659073 Canada Inc., Kuldeep S. Palak. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (kms) |
**New case** Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (kms) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0755-4571612.), filed by Patton Salyer. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Kuldeep Summons, #2 Proposed Summons Canada Inc Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet CCS)(Small, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.