Blasingame v. Galipeau et al
| William Blasingame, III |
| Patel, Dorothy Livers, John Harvil, Andrew Liaw and John Galipeau |
| WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only) |
| 3:2021cv00384 |
| May 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Damon R Leichty |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff William Blasingame, III. (nae)
|
|
Filing 2
PRO SE COMPLAINT with request for preliminary injunction against John Galipeau, John Harvil, Andrew Liaw, Dorothy Livers, Patel, filed by William Blasingame, III. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(nae)
|
|
Filing 1
Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by William Blasingame, III. Pursuant to General Order 2018-1, documents submitted to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (nae)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
