Jones v. Libel et al
| Audrain Jones and Audrain L Jones |
| Wesselar, John Doe, D Buss, Anne and Dave Libel |
| 3:2021cv00414 |
| June 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (lhc) |
Filing 3
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 7/26/2021. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(lhc)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff until 7/15/2021 to either pay the filing fee or file an in forma pauperis motion with a copy of his inmate trust fund ledger detailing his transactions for the past six months. He is CAUTIONED that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 6/11/2021. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mrm) Modified on 6/14/2021 to correct text (ksp).
|
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Anne, D Buss, John Doe, Dave Libel, Wesselar, filed by Audrain Jones. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(No filing fee or IFP received)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Jones)(kms) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
