Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Delano Jackson |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA (Court Use Only) |
| 3:2021cv00455 |
| June 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Joshua P Kolar |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTE: The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. (shk) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/28/2021: #1 Corrected Summons to Baltimore Office) (shk).
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 6/28/2021. (shk)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar added. (NEW CASE, MOTION PENDING) (jld)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Karl E Osterhout on behalf of Delano Jackson (Osterhout, Karl)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Delano Jackson. (Attachments: #1 USM 285 Forms)(Osterhout, Karl)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Delano Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons to U.S. Attorney, #3 Proposed Summons to OGC, #4 Proposed Summons to Attorney General)(Osterhout, Karl)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
