Graham v. Herron Management Property et al
| DeAnn Graham and DeAnn G Graham |
| Herron Management Property and Jill Herron |
| 3:2021cv00530 |
| July 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Proposed Summons filed by DeAnn Graham. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kms)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: The Court GRANTS the plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 ; and WAIVES payment of the filing fee. Ms. Graham did not submit proposed summons for each defendant. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enclose with this order one USM-285 Form and two AO 440 (Rev 6/12) Forms. If Ms. Graham wants the Court to order the U.S. Marshal to serve the defendants, she must fill out completely each enclosed form and file them in this case by 9/24/2021. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 8/24/2021. (Copy mailed to pro se party as directed in Order)(lhc)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff DeAnn Graham. (jld)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Article III Judge and a Jury Trial by Plaintiff DeAnn Graham. (jld)
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE COMPLAINT against Jill Herron, Herron Management Property, filed by DeAnn Graham. (Attachments: #1 Nature of Action, #2 Appellant's Exhibits, #3 Proposed Summons and USM-285)(jld)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
