Simpson v. Johnson et al
Billy J Simpson |
Andrew Johnson and Jacob Lloyd |
3:2021cv00541 |
July 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Michael G Gotsch |
Damon R Leichty |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Andrew Johnson, Jacob Lloyd.(Schneeman, Pamela) |
Filing 5 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Andrew Johnson, Jacob Lloyd. (Schneeman, Pamela) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Pamela G Schneeman on behalf of Andrew Johnson, Jacob Lloyd (Schneeman, Pamela) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by James S Stephenson on behalf of Andrew Johnson, Jacob Lloyd (Stephenson, James) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Andrew Johnson, Jacob Lloyd. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (Attachments: #1 Lloyd)(nae) |
***NEW CASE*** Judge Damon R Leichty and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (nae) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0755-4640059.), filed by Billy J Simpson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Summons to Johnson, #3 Proposed Summons Summons to Lloyd)(Starkey, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.