Browning v. Neal et al
| Tavares J Browning and Tavares Jermaine Browning |
| Ron Neal, D Lott, Hasskell, Fintch and Neal |
| INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only) |
| 3:2021cv00544 |
| July 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
Letter from Tavares J Browning re: Time Extension for In Forma Pauperis in civil matter. (jld)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER DENYING request for counsel #11 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 9/13/2021. (bas)
|
|
Filing 11
Letter from Tavares J Browning requesting appointment of counsel. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (kms)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING #9 Motion for Enlargement of Time by Plaintiff Tavares J Browning in part and EXTENDING the deadline for him to resolve his filing fee as explained to 9/15/2021 and DENYING #9 in all other respects; DIRECTING the Clerk to place this cause number on a blank Prisoner Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis AO240 (Rev. 7/10) (INND Rev. 8/16) and send it to Tavares J. Browning; and CAUTIONING Tavares J. Browning that, if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 8/13/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP) (mrm)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for Enlargement of Time by Plaintiff Tavares J Browning. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kms)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER denying #7 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 8/10/2021. (shk)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Plaintiff Tavares J Browning. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kms)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER DENYING #5 Letter from Tavares J Browning requesting to combine this case with case number 3:21-cv-542. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 8/6/2021. (lhc)
|
|
Filing 5
Letter from Tavares J Browning requesting to combine this case with case number 3:21-cv-542. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (kms)
|
|
Filing 4
Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by Tavares J Browning. Pursuant to General Order 2018-1, documents submitted to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (kms)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Tavares J. Browning is GRANTED until 9/2/2021 to respond to this order and CAUTIONED if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 7/29/2021. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(bas)
|
|
Filing 2
PRO SE COMPLAINT against Fintch, Hasskell, D Lott, Neal, Ron Neal, filed by Tavares J Browning. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(No filing fee or IFP received)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Browning)(kms)
|
|
Filing 1
RECEIPT of evidence to add to "Prisoner Complaint" in regards to Lt Lott, Lt. Neal, Sgt. Hasskell, Sgt. Fintch, and Warden Ron Neal, from Tavares J Browning. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kms)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
