Swank v. Ruddell et al
Shannon Swank |
Regeina Ruddell, Angel Schnick, Anderson, Prohl and Regeina A Ruddell |
3:2021cv00581 |
August 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Michael G Gotsch |
Damon R Leichty |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 ORDER STRIKING #1 Pro Se Complaint filed by Shannon Swank; DIRECTING the clerk to place this cause number on a blank Pro Se 14 (INND Rev. 2/20) Prisoner Complaint form and a blank Prisoner Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis AO 240 (Rev. 7/10) (INND Rev. 8/16) and send them to the plaintiff; GRANTING the plaintiff until 9/13/2021, to either pay the filing fee or file an in forma pauperis motion on the courts form, accompanied by his trust fund ledgers for the past six months, and file an amended complaint as outlined herein; and CAUTIONING him that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case is subject to dismissal without further notice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 8/10/2021. (Copy mailed to pro se party w/form as directed)(mrm) |
Filing 1 **STRICKEN per DE #1 Order** PRO SE COMPLAINT against Anderson, Prohl, Regeina Ruddell, Angel Schnick, filed by Shannon Swank. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(No filing fee or IFP received)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Swank)(kms) Modified on 8/10/2021 to strike (mrm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.