Hardy v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff: Mr. Glenford Wayne Hardy and Glenford Hardy
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Case Number: 3:2021cv00800
Filed: October 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Jon E DeGuilio
Referring Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Nature of Suit: Federal Employer's Liability
Cause of Action: 45 U.S.C. ยง 51
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. (slm)
December 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER, Joint Proposed Discovery due by 12/23/2021. Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 1/4/2022 11:15 AM in US District Court - South Bend before Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch Sr.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 12/3/21. (slm)
December 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Norfolk Southern Railway Company.(Loftus, Barry)
November 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew A Heisz on behalf of Norfolk Southern Railway Company (Heisz, Andrew)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Norfolk Southern Railway Company identifying Corporate Parent Norfolk Southern Corporation for Norfolk Southern Railway Company.. (Loftus, Barry)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Barry L Loftus on behalf of Norfolk Southern Railway Company (Loftus, Barry)
November 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Norfolk Southern Railway Company. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (lhc)
November 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Proposed Summons filed by Glenford Hardy. (Harrington, Robert)
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order **NEW CASE** Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (nhc)
October 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Norfolk Southern Railway Company( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0755-4719756.), filed by Glenford Wayne Hardy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Harrington, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hardy v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mr. Glenford Wayne Hardy
Represented By: Robert E Harrington, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Glenford Hardy
Represented By: Robert E Harrington, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Represented By: Barry L Loftus
Represented By: Andrew A Heisz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?