Baldwin v. Snavely's Machine & Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Glen Baldwin |
Snavelys Machine & Manufacturing Co., Inc. and Snavely's Machine & Manufacturing Co., Inc. |
3:2021cv00891 |
November 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Michael G Gotsch |
Damon R Leichty |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice pursuant to #5 notice of voluntary dismissal. Text-only order by Judge Damon R Leichty on 1/6/22. (dk) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Glen Baldwin (Logan, Paul) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul A Logan on behalf of Glen Baldwin (Logan, Paul) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Snavelys Machine & Manufacturing Co., Inc.. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (nhc) |
**NEW CASE** Judge Damon R Leichty and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (nhc) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John H Haskin on behalf of Glen Baldwin (Haskin, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Snavelys Machine & Manufacturing Co., Inc.( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-4760709.), filed by Glen Baldwin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Haskin, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.