Richards v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Ian M. Richards |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA (Court Use Only) |
| 3:2021cv00898 |
| November 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| William C Lee |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge William C Lee for all further proceedings. Judge Damon R Leichty no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 1/7/2022. (lns)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTE: The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. (jdb)
|
|
**NEW CASE** Judge Damon R Leichty and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (jdb)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Meredith Marcus on behalf of Ian M. Richards (Marcus, Meredith)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Frederick J Daley, Jr on behalf of Ian M. Richards (Daley, Frederick)
|
|
Filing 2
Proposed Summons filed by Ian M. Richards. (Daley, Frederick)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-4763877.), filed by Ian M. Richards. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Daley, Frederick)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
