Pratt v. Logansport Police Department et al
| Rex Alan Pratt |
| Logansport Police Department, Bryce Hall, Jonathan Flory and Carrie Wammack |
| 3:2021cv00913 |
| December 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Damon R Leichty |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
NOTICE of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons sent to Bryce Hall. Waiver of Service due by 2/25/2022. (Copy sent via US Mail to Logansport Police Department) (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Opinion and Order) (shk)
|
|
Filing 6
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS Rex Alan Pratt leave to proceed against Bryce Hall in his individual capacity for compensatory and punitive damages for punching him in the face while he was bound, in violation of the Fourth Amendment; DISMISSES all other claims; DISMISSES Jonathan Flory, Carrie Wammack, and Logansport PoliceDepartment; DIRECTS the clerk, under 28 U.S.C. 1915(d), to request Waiver of Service from (and if necessary, the United States Marshals Service to use any lawful means to locate and serve process on) Bryce Hall at Logansport Police Department, with a copy of this order and the complaint (ECF 1); ORDERS Logansport Police Department to provide the full name, date of birth, and last known home address of the defendant, if he does not waive service and it has such information; and ORDERS, under 42 U.S.C. 1997e(g)(2), Bryce Hall to respond, as provided forin the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and N.D. Ind. L.R. 10-1(b), only to the claims for which the plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 1/25/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(shk)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: The court GRANTS the plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 ; WAIVES the initial partial filing fee; ORDERS the plaintiff, Rex Alan Pratt, IDOC # 193643, Cass County Jail # 247566, to pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTS the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; and DIRECTS the clerk to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 01/04/2022. (Copy mailed as directed in Order) (jdb)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Rex Alan Pratt. (Attachments: #1 Concerning Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis, #2 Envelope)(jld)
|
|
Filing 3
Letter from Rex Pratt requesting an extension of time to file IFP and request for IFP form (IFP form sent to Pratt) (nae)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Rex Alan Pratt is GRANTED until 1/10/2022, to respond to this order and CAUTIONED if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 12/6/2021. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(lhc)
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE COMPLAINT against Jonathan Flory, Bryce Hall, Logansport Police Department, Carrie Wammack, filed by Rex Alan Pratt. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(No filing fee or IFP received)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Pratt)(kms)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
