Barton v. Quality Mark, Inc et al
| LESLIE W. BARTON |
| QUALITY MARK, INC., AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON SERVICES, LLC |
| 3:2021cv00922 |
| December 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Damon R Leichty |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Quality Mark, Inc.. (Keen, Robert) |
Filing 14
ORDER: Pursuant to FRCP 7.1(a), Quality Mark, Inc. is ORDERED to file a corporate disclosure statement by 1/14/2022. Text-only order by Judge Damon R Leichty on 1/11/22. (dk)
|
|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER: The Court ADOPTS by reference. Consistent with that plan, the Court now enters the instant Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order regarding the conduct of discovery and deadlines as follows: The parties will exchange the information required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) by 3/7/2022. The last date to amend the pleadings without leave of court as to plaintiff(s) is 7/6/2022; as to defendant(s) is 8/8/2022. The serving of reports from retained experts under Rule 26(a)(2) are due from plaintiff(s) by 10/7/2022; and from defendant(s) by 11/11/2022. Supplementation under Rule 26(e) due every six weeks until trial. The last date for the completion of ALL DISCOVERY is 4/7/2023. the last date to file any discovery-related nondispositive motion is 3/7/2023. The deadline to file any dispositive motions is 6/2/2023. Parties shall name a mediator no later than 2/14/2022. The deadline for the parties to engage in mediation is 5/3/2023. The Court hereby VACATES the Preliminary Pretrial Conference scheduled for 1/13/2022, at 11:45 a.m. E.S.T. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 1/10/2022. (mrm)
|
| Filing 12 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Quality Mark, Inc.. (Keen, Robert) |
| Filing 11 Defendant Quality Mark, Inc.'s ANSWER to Complaint for Damages by Quality Mark, Inc..(Keen, Robert) |
| Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Jankowski, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 Amended ANSWER to Complaint by Amazon Services, LLC, Amazon.com, Inc..(Jankowski, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. (slm) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER, Joint Proposed Discovery due by 1/6/2022. Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 1/13/2022 11:45 AM in US District Court - South Bend before Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch Sr.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 12/16/21. (slm)
|
| Filing 6 Defendants Amazon.com, Inc.'s and Amazon.com Services LLC's ANSWER to Complaint by Amazon Services, LLC, Amazon.com, Inc..(Jankowski, Matthew) |
| **NEW CASE** Judge Damon R Leichty and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (nhc) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by AMAZON SERVICES, LLC, AMAZON.COM, INC. OF FILING IN STATE COURT (Jankowski, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AMAZON SERVICES, LLC, AMAZON.COM, INC.. (Jankowski, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew J Jankowski on behalf of AMAZON SERVICES, LLC, AMAZON.COM, INC. (Jankowski, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-4771058.) from Pulaski, Cause No. 66C01-2111-CT-0015, filed by AMAZON SERVICES, LLC, AMAZON.COM, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Court Record)(Jankowski, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
