Wright v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Lashonda J. Wright |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA (Court Use Only) |
| 3:2021cv00952 |
| December 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The parties having consented pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c), this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr for all purposes and is reassigned pursuant to General Order 2020-27 from Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr to Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr. (kms) Modified on 2/2/2022 (kms).
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE: Commissioner of Social Security was directed to return the Consent to or Declination of the Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge attached at Docket Entry #9 regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Clerk's Office has not received the form. As required by General Order 2020-27, Commissioner of Social Security shall return the form within 10 days of the date of this entry. If, after the expiration of the 10-day extension set forth herein, the Court chooses to take further action, all applicable deadline extensions will be considered at that time. Counsel also advised of 10-day consent deadline by correspondence. (kms)
|
|
Filing 10
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lashonda J. Wright. Commissioner of Social Security and Attorney General served on 1/10/2022; U.S. Attorney served on 1/11/2022, answer due 3/14/2022 (mrm)
|
|
Filing 9
MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS IN A SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL CASE sent to all parties. Magistrate Consent forms due by 1/28/2022. (slm)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Brian Irvin on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Irvin, Brian)
|
|
Filing 7
Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTE: The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. (cc: USMS) (jdb)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: The Court GRANTS the plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 ; WAIVES payment of the filing fee; and DIRECTS, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d), the United States Marshals Service to effect service of process on the defendant. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 12/21/2021. (cc: USMS) (jdb)
|
|
**NEW CASE** **MOTION PENDING** Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (nhc)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Ann E Young on behalf of Lashonda J. Wright (Young, Ann)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Jason S Rodman on behalf of Lashonda J. Wright (Rodman, Jason)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Randal S Forbes on behalf of Lashonda J. Wright (Forbes, Randal)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Lashonda J. Wright. (Forbes, Randal)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT to Review Decision of Commissioner of Social Security Administration against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Lashonda J. Wright. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons)(Forbes, Randal)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
