Crockett v. Warden
Petitioner: William B Crockett, III and William Bernard Crockett, III
Respondent: Warden
Case Number: 3:2022cv00003
Filed: January 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Jon E DeGuilio
Referring Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2022 Filing 9 AMENDED CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (copy mailed to pro se party). (shk)
February 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: The order dismissing the case for failure to prosecute #3 is VACATED. The amended petition #5 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. The clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 2/28/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(shk)
February 28, 2022 Filing 6 (unsigned) Letter to Judge re: habeas. (No return address on envelope) (nae)
February 28, 2022 ***Civil Case Terminated(shk)
February 25, 2022 Filing 5 Amended PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by William B Crockett, III. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Copy of DE #2 Order, #3 Copy of docket sheet, #4 Envelope)(kms)
February 23, 2022 Filing 4 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (copy mailed to pro se party). (shk)
February 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 **VACATED pursuant to Order #8 ** ORDER: This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 2/23/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(shk) Modified on 2/28/2022 (shk).
January 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: The court STRIKES the petition #1 ; DIRECTS the clerk to place this cause number on a blank prisoner habeas corpus form AO 241 (Rev. 9/17) (Conviction, INND Rev. 2/20) and send it to petitioner; GRANTS the petitioner to and including 2/7/2022, to file an amended petition on the appropriate form, and either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by a certified copy of his trust fund ledgers for the past six months; and CAUTIONS him that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case is subject to dismissal without further notice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 1/5/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party as directed in Order)(lhc)
January 3, 2022 Filing 1 *STRICKEN pursuant to #2 * PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by William B Crockett, III. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Crockett)(kms) Modified on 1/5/2022 (lhc).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crockett v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William B Crockett, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William Bernard Crockett, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?