Ware v. State of Ind et al
Malik Ware and Malik Alonzo Ware |
State of Ind, Elkhart County Jail, John or Jane Does and John or Jane Doe(s) |
3:2022cv00013 |
January 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Jon E DeGuilio |
Michael G Gotsch |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER: The Court GRANTS the plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis #7 ; ORDERS the plaintiff, Malik Ware, IDOC # 201820, to immediately pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) $21.49 to the clerk in payment of the initial partial filing fee; ORDERS the plaintiff to pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTS the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; and DIRECTS the clerk to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 2/14/2022. (Copy mailed as directed in Order) (cc: Financial)(shk) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Discovery by Plaintiff Malik Ware. (Received without case number) (kms) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Malik Ware. (Received without case number) (kms) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against John or Jane Doe(s)(St Joseph County Jail Search & Procedure Officer), John or Jane Doe(s)(St Joseph County Jail Classification Officer), John or Jane Doe(s)(St Joseph County Jail Transport Officer), John or Jane Does(Lake County Jail Transport Officer), John or Jane Does(Lake County Jail Search & Procedure Officer), Elkhart County Jail, State of Ind, filed by Malik Ware. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Received without case number)(kms) |
Filing 5 ORDER: The Court STRIKES the complaint #1 ; DENIES the motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF #2 , #3 ); DENIES the motion for discovery #4 ; and GRANTS the plaintiff until 2/9/2022, to file a renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by a certified copy of his trust fund ledgers for the past six months, and file an amended complaint that is properly signed and that clearly outlines his claims against each defendant; and CAUTIONS him that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case is subject to dismissal without further notice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 1/7/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(lhc) |
Filing 4 (Unsigned) MOTION for Discovery by Plaintiff Malik Ware. (kms) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Malik Ware. (kms) |
Filing 2 (Unsigned) MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Malik Ware. (kms) |
Filing 1 *STRICKEN pursuant to #5 * (Unsigned) PRO SE COMPLAINT against John or Jane Doe(s)(St Joseph County Jail Search & Procedure Officer), John or Jane Doe(s)(St Joseph County Jail Classification Officer), John or Jane Doe(s)(St Joseph County Jail Transport Officer), John or Jane Does(Lake County Jail Transport Officer), John or Jane Does(Lake County Jail Search & Procedure Officer), Elkhart County Jail, State of Ind, filed by Malik Ware. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Ware)(kms) Modified on 1/7/2022 (lhc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.