Jones v. Galipeau et al
Plaintiff: Audrain Jones
Defendant: John Galipeau, Gann, Critten and Lewis
Not Classified By Court: WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Case Number: 3:2022cv00091
Filed: January 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Jon E DeGuilio
Referring Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER DENYING #9 Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Audrain Jones. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 3/8/2022. (mrm)
March 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Audrain Jones. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nae)
March 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING Audrain Jones until 3/31/2022, to file an amended complaint and CAUTIONING Audrain Jones if he does not respond by the deadline, this case will be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. 1915A without further notice because the current complaint does not state a claim for which relief can be granted. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 3/2/2022. (mrm)
February 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Audrain Jones; WAIVING the initial partial filing fee; ORDERING the plaintiff, Audrain Jones, IDOC # 133236, to pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTING the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; and DIRECTING the clerk to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 2/28/2022.(Copy mailed to Westville Correctional Facility) (asd)
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Letter to Inmate Trust Fund Department and Audrain Jones re: filing fee payment received. (nae)
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RESPONSE to #3 Order titled as Declaration in Support of Request for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Audrain Jones. (nae)
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by Audrain Jones. Pursuant to General Order 2018-1, documents submitted to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (nae)
February 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Audrain Jones is GRANTED until 3/7/2022, to respond to this order and CAUTIONED if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 2/2/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nhc)
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Audrain Jones. (kms)
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Critten, John Galipeau, Gann, Lewis, filed by Audrain Jones. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Jones)(kms)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Galipeau et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Audrain Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Galipeau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Critten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?