Fisher v. Indiana Dept of Corrections et al
| Louis Lee Fisher |
| Indiana Dept of Corrections and Hall |
| 3:2022cv00229 |
| March 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Damon R Leichty |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Hall. Hall waiver sent on 4/21/2022, answer due 6/21/2022. (Pratt, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas S Pratt on behalf of Hall (Pratt, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons sent to Mrs. Hall. Waiver of Service due by 5/23/2022. (Attachments: #1 Order, #2 Complaint) (asd)
|
|
Filing 6
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS Louis Lee Fisher leave to proceed against Mrs. Hall in her individual capacity for compensatory damages for assessing restitution knowing Mr. Fisher had received no pre-deprivation due process, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment; DISMISSES all other claims; DISMISSES Indiana Department of Corrections; DIRECTS the clerk, under 28 U.S.C. 1915(d), to request Waiver of Service from (and if necessary, the United States Marshals Service to serve process on) Mrs. Hall at the Indiana Department of Correction, with a copy of this order and the complaint (ECF #1 ); ORDERS the Indiana Department of Correction to provide the full name, date of birth, and last known home address of the defendant if she does not waive service andit has such information; and ORDERS, under 42 U.S.C. 1997e(g)(2), Mrs. Hall to respond, as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and N.D. Ind. L.R. 10-1(b), only to the claims for which the plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 4/21/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(asd)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: The court GRANTS the plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 ; WAIVES the initial partial filing fee; ORDERS the plaintiff, Louis Lee Fisher, IDOC # 247145, to pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTS the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; and DIRECTS the clerk to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 04/19/2022. (Copy mailed as directed in Order) (jdb)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Louis Lee Fisher. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mrm)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Louis Lee Fisher is GRANTED until 04/26/2022 to respond to this order and CAUTIONED if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 03/24/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (jdb)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER: The clerk is DIRECTED to close case 1:22-cv-94 and open a new case with these filings in the South Bend Division. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 3/23/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(lhc)
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE COMPLAINT against Hall, Indiana Dept of Corrections, filed by Louis Lee Fisher. (No filing fee or IFP submitted) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lhc) Modified on 3/21/2022 cc: Copy to plaintiff (lhc).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
