State Farm & Fire Casualty Company v. Reliance Worldwide Corporation et al
State Farm & Fire Casualty Company |
Reliance Worldwide Corporation, Rheem Manufacturing Co, Reliance Worldwide Corporation doing business as Cash Acme and Rheem Manufacturing Company |
3:2022cv00315 |
April 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Michael G Gotsch |
Robert L Miller |
Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Judge Robert L Miller, Jr and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (NEW CASE) (jld) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward F Harney, Jr on behalf of Reliance Worldwide Corporation (Harney, Edward) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-4896950.) from St. Joseph County Circuit Court, Cause No. 71C01-2203-CT-000083, filed by Reliance Worldwide Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Harney, Edward) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with jury demand by Reliance Worldwide Corporation.(jld) |
Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Reliance Worldwide Corporation.(jld) |
Filing 3 STATE COURT COMPLAINT against Reliance Worldwide Corporation, Rheem Manufacturing Company, filed by State Farm & Fire Casualty Company.(jld) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.