Hampton v. Hyatte et al
Plaintiff: Edward M Hampton
Defendant: William R Hyatte and Unknown Officers
Not Classified By Court: MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Case Number: 3:2022cv00376
Filed: May 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Referring Judge: Damon R Leichty
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 6, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Reconsideration re #4 Order by Plaintiff Edward M Hampton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jld)
June 2, 2022 Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Edward M Hampton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kms)
June 2, 2022 Filing 5 Notice of Plaintiff's DISCOVERY Request by Edward M Hampton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kms)
May 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DENYING #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Edward M Hampton; GRANTING Edward M. Hampton until 6/27/2022, to pay the $402.00 filing fee; and CAUTIONS Edward M. Hampton that if he does not pay the filing fee by that date, this case will be dismissed without prejudice for non-payment of the filing fee. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 5/27/2022. (asd)
May 23, 2022 Filing 3 Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program Pursuant to General Order 2018-1, documents submitted to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (nhc)
May 12, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (received as part of complaint) by Plaintiff Edward M Hampton. (nae)
May 12, 2022 Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against William R Hyatte, Unknown Officers, filed by Edward M Hampton. (Returned copy with case number to Hampton) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(nae)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hampton v. Hyatte et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward M Hampton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William R Hyatte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Officers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?