Giza v. Arnold et al
Plaintiff: Nicholas Giza
Defendant: Arnold and Ron Neal
Case Number: 3:2022cv00391
Filed: May 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Jon E DeGuilio
Referring Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Letter to Nicholas Giza in response to DE #5 (copy mailed to Giza) (nae)
June 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: The court GRANTS the plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 ; WAIVES the initial partial filing fee; ORDERS the plaintiff, Nicholas Giza, IDOC # 245275, to pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTS the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; and DIRECTS the clerk to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 06/16/2022. (Copy mailed as directed in Order) (jdb)
June 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Future Change of Address by Nicholas Giza from ISP to 6034 Debra Ln, Lowell, IN 46356 (nae)
June 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) and new address effective 6/23/2022, by Plaintiff Nicholas Giza. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(kmt)
June 13, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Deficiency Deadline terminated. (kmt)
May 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to write this cause number on a blank Prisoner Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis AO 240 (Rev. 7/10) (INND Rev. 8/16) and send it to Nicholas Giza; GRANTS Nicholas Giza until 6/20/2022, to either pay the filing fee or file an in forma pauperis petition accompanied by his trust fund ledgers for the past six months; and CAUTIONS Nicholas Giza that if he fails to respond by the above deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 5/24/2022. (Copy of Order and blank Prisoner IFP Motion mailed to Plaintiff)(asd)
May 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Arnold, Ron Neal, filed by Nicholas Giza. (No filing fee or IFP received) (Returned copy with case number to Giza) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(nae)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Giza v. Arnold et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicholas Giza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arnold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ron Neal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?