Gore v. Warden
Petitioner: Jerry A Gore, Sr
Respondent: Warden
Case Number: 3:2022cv00402
Filed: May 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Referring Judge: Damon R Leichty
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The parties having consented pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c), this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr for all purposes and is reassigned pursuant to General Order 2018-2 from Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr and Judge Damon R Leichty to Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr. (kmt)
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE: Counsel for Warden was directed to return the Consent to or Declination of the Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge attached at Docket Entry #5 regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Clerk's Office has not received the form. Counsel for Warden shall return the form within 10 days of the date of this entry. If, after the expiration of the 10-day extension set forth herein, the Court chooses to take further action, all applicable deadline extensions will be considered at that time. Counsel also advised of 10-day consent deadline by correspondence. (kmt)
July 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER denying #6 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 7/8/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nhc)
July 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Petitioner Jerry A Gore, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope) (Copy mailed to pro set party) (jdb)
June 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (Copy mailed to pro se party). Magistrate Consent forms due by 7/5/2022. (slm)
June 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Erica S Sullivan on behalf of Warden (Sullivan, Erica)
May 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE GRANTING #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Pursuant to Section 2254 Habeas Corpus Rule 5, the respondent is ORDERED to enter an appearance by June 13, 2022, and to file a response to the petition with the entire administrative record by August 1, 2022. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 5/23/22. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mlc)
May 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jerry A Gore, Sr. (nae)
May 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jerry A Gore, Sr. (Returned copy with case number to Gore)(nae)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gore v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jerry A Gore, Sr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Represented By: Erica S Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?