Brazier v. Wisniewski et al
| Kevin Brazier and Kevin Dashawn Demarcus Brazier Jr III |
| Jason Wisniewski, Alexander Baker, Brent Rose and Carr |
| 3:2022cv00587 |
| July 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING #9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. ORDERING Kevin Brazier, IDOC # 228965 to immediately pay $12.71 to the clerk in payment of the initial partial filing fee; ORDERING Plaintiff to pay to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; and DIRECTING the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds and to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 9/16/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party and Correctional Industrial Facility Inmate Trust Fund Acct.)(mrm)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Kevin Brazier. (nae)
|
|
Filing 8
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Kevin Brazier. (kmt)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER DIRECTING the clerk to write this cause number on a blank Prisoner Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis AO 240 (Rev. 7/10) (INND Rev. 8/16) and send it to the plaintiff. GRANTING the plaintiff until 9/16/2022, to either pay the filing fee or file an in forma pauperis petition accompanied by his trust fund ledgers for the past six months and CAUTIONING the plaintiff that if he fails to respond by the above deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 8/17/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party with form as directed in order)(mrm)
|
|
Filing 6
Case transferred in from Southern District of Indiana. No IFP petition filed/filing fee not paid. (jld)
|
|
Filing 5
Case transferred in from District of Indiana Southern; Case Number 1:22-cv-01461. Original file and docket sheet received.
|
|
Filing 4
Transfer Letter to Clerk of the Northern District of Indiana. Case transferred electronically to Northern District of Indiana, on 7/22/2022. (CKM) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 7/26/2022.]
|
|
Filing 3
CLOSED TRANSFER - Kevin Dashawn Demarcus Brazier, JRIII, an inmate at the Pendleton Correctional Facility filed this case against various St. Joseph County Jail staff members regarding events that occurred while he was incarcerated there. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a), for the convenience of parties and witnesses, and in the interest of justice, this action is now TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/22/2022. Copy Sent to Plaintiff Via U.S. Mail (CKM) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 7/26/2022.]
|
|
Filing 2
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (dist. made) (NLR) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 7/26/2022.]
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against ALEXANDER BAKER, CARR, BRENT ROSE, JASON WISNIEWSKI, filed by KEVIN DASHAWN DEMARCUS JR, III BRAZIER. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(NLR) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 7/26/2022.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
