Harrell v. Marthakis
Plaintiff: Raveon Harrell
Defendant: Nancy Marthais and Dr Nancy Marthakis
Case Number: 3:2022cv00606
Filed: July 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Jon E DeGuilio
Referring Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Nancy Marthakis. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (copy sent to pro se prisoner with copy of order #5 and complaint) (shk)
September 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 OPINION AND ORDER: The court DIRECTS the clerk to amend the docket to reflect the correct spelling of the defendant's name: Dr. Nancy Marthakis; GRANTS Raveon Harrell leave to proceed against Dr. Nancy Marthakis in her individual capacity for compensatory and punitive damages for deliberate indifference to Harrell's pain and suffering related to his hernia, in violation of the Eighth Amendment; DISMISSES all other claims; DIRECTS Raveon Harrell to make arrangements to serve Dr. Nancy Marthakis; and ORDERS, under 42 U.S.C. 1997e(g)(2), Dr. Nancy Marthakis to respond, as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and N.D. Ind. L.R. 10-1(b), only to the claims for which the plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 9/21/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(shk)
August 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 3029575 (jld)
August 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Letter from Raveon Harrell re: correcting defendant's last name and filing fee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (kmt)
August 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Raveon Harrell is GRANTED until 09/06/2022, to respond to this order and CAUTIONED if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 08/04/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (jdb)
July 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Nancy Marthais, filed by Raveon Harrell. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(No filing fee or IFP received)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Harrell)(kmt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harrell v. Marthakis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raveon Harrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy Marthais
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr Nancy Marthakis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?