Chambers v. Byrum et al
| Jerry Chambers |
| Byrum and T Carty |
| 3:2022cv00662 |
| August 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: The court: DENIES Jerry Chambers leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 ; GRANTS Jerry Chambers until 10/03/2022, to pay the $402.00 filing fee; and CAUTIONS Jerry Chambers that if he does not pay the filing fee by that date, this case will be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 09/02/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (jdb)
|
| Set Deadline: Deficiency to be cured by 10/3/2022, (jdb) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The is DIRECTED to close case 2:22-cv-233 and open a new case with these filings in the South Bend Division. Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr. assigned. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 8/15/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(asd)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Jerry Chambers. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(shk) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Byrum, T Carty, filed by Jerry Chambers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(shk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
