Jackson v. Neal et al
| Ashonta Kenya Jackson |
| Ron Neal, Herbert Newkirk and John Doe |
| 3:2022cv00687 |
| August 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Robert L Miller |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Filing fee received: $ 153.00, receipt number 3029803. Filing fee of $402.00 paid in full. (kmt)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Ashonta Kenya Jackson is GRANTED until 10/03/2022 to resolve his filing fee status as described above and CAUTIONED if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 08/30/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (jdb)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER denying #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 8/30/22. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nal)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Plaintiff Ashonta Kenya Jackson. (kmt)
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE COMPLAINT against John Doe, Ron Neal, Herbert Newkirk (Partial Filing fee received $ 250.00. Receipt #3029606), filed by Ashonta Kenya Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Jackson)(kmt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
