Houx v. Warden
Petitioner: Allen Houx, Allen M Houx, Jr, Allen Mering Houx Moreno and Allen Mering Houx, Jr
Respondent: Warden
Case Number: 3:2022cv00718
Filed: August 30, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Referring Judge: Damon R Leichty
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (copy to pro se party) (mlc)
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING #6 Motion for Counsel; DISMISSING the amended habeas petition (ECF 4) without prejudice because the claims are unexhausted; DENYING Allen Houx a certificate of appealability pursuant to Section 2254Habeas Corpus Rule 11 and DIRECTING the clerk to close this case. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 9/12/22. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mlc)
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Petitioner Allen Houx. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(kmt)
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Petitioner Allen Houx. (kmt)
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Amended PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Allen Houx. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(kmt)
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Petitioner Allen Houx. (kmt)
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Petitioner Allen Houx. (kmt)
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Allen Houx. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Houx)(kmt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Houx v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Allen Houx
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Allen M Houx, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Allen Mering Houx Moreno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Allen Mering Houx, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?