Gregory v. Carter et al
| Michael K Gregory and Michael Kimble Gregory |
| Robert E Carter, Jr, David Liebel, Indiana Dept of Correction, Wabash Valley Correctional Facility, D Bedwell, Aramark Food Services, LT and UTM |
| 3:2022cv00768 |
| September 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Damon R Leichty |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Mail Returned from Michael K Gregory as Undeliverable - Refused - Return to Sender - Not Deliverable as Addressed - Unable to Forward - #3 Order Transferring Case to Other District. (jdb) |
Filing 3
ORDER: Under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a), this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 09/16/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (jdb)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michael K Gregory. (kmt) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Aramark Food Services, D Bedwell, Robert E Carter, Jr, Indiana Dept of Correction, LT, David Liebel, UTM, Wabash Valley Correctional Facility, filed by Michael K Gregory. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Gregory)(kmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
