Williams v. Wabash County Sheriff et al
KENNIST WILLIAMS |
Wabash County Sheriff, OFFICER C DAWES, OFFICER C BOWLING, OFFICER J WATERS, C Dawes, C Bowling and J Waters |
3:2022cv00791 |
September 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Michael G Gotsch |
Damon R Leichty |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by C Bowling, C Dawes, Wabash County Sheriff, J Waters.(Witte, Daniel) |
Set Deadlines: Wabash County Sheriff, C Dawes, C Bowling, and J Waters Answer due 11/7/2022 pursuant to DE #3 . (kmt) |
**NEW CASE** Judge Damon R Leichty and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (kmt) |
Filing 3 AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by C BOWLING, C DAWES, J WATERS, Wabash County Sheriff ; answer due by November 7, 2022. (Witte, Daniel) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel M Witte on behalf of All Defendants (Witte, Daniel) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-5027156.) from Wabash County Superior Court, Cause No. 85D01-2208-CT-000529, filed by C BOWLING, C DAWES, Wabash County Sheriff, J WATERS. (Attachments: #1 Supplement State Court Record, #2 Supplement Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Witte, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.