Wilson v. Castaneda
Plaintiff: Malcom Wilson
Defendant: Castaneda
Case Number: 3:2022cv00822
Filed: September 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Jon E DeGuilio
Referring Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 USCA Case Number 22-3068 for #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Malcom Wilson. (Attachments: #1 PLRA Fee Notice and Order)(jld)
November 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Short Record Sent to US Court of Appeals re #7 Notice of Appeal. No appeal fees paid. (kmt)
November 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Malcom Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(kmt)
November 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Docketing Statement re: #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Malcom Wilson. (kmt)
November 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #4 Clerks Judgment, #3 Opinion and Order, by Malcom Wilson. (kmt)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to Reconsider & Correct Error re #4 Clerks Judgment, #3 Opinion and Order, by Plaintiff Malcom Wilson. (kmt)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: The court GRANTS the plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 ; WAIVES the initial partial filing fee; ORDERS the plaintiff, Malcom Wilson, IDOC # 104959, to pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTS the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; and DIRECTS the clerk to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 10/24/2022. (Copy mailed as directed in Order) (jdb)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (jdb)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 OPINION AND ORDER: This case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A because it does not state a claim. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 10/24/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (jdb)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Malcom Wilson. (kmt)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Castaneda, filed by Malcom Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Wilson)(kmt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilson v. Castaneda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Malcom Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Castaneda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?