Lacy v. Adult Probation Department et al
| Adrian Eugene Lacy and Adrian Lacy |
| Adult Probation Department and Michigan City Superior Court 1 |
| 3:2022cv00823 |
| September 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Damon R Leichty |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: The court GRANTS Adrian Eugene Lacy's request #9 for additional time to pay the filing fee; EXTENDS the deadline to pay the remaining $350.00 balance of the filing fee until 12/2/2022; and CAUTIONS Adrian Eugene Lacy that, if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice for non-payment of the filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 11/4/22. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nhc)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION Requesting an Extension to Pay Filing Fees re #7 Order by Plaintiff Adrian Eugene Lacy. (jdb) |
| Filing 8 Mail Returned from Adrian Eugene Lacy as Undeliverable - #3 Order Directing Prisoner Payment. Envelope marked - Return to Sender, Not Deliverable as Addressed, Unable to Forward. (Order previously resent to new address in DE 5) (sej) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: The court GRANTS Adrian Eugene Lacy until 11/4/2022, to either pay the remaining $350.00 balance of the filing fee OR seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis as explained in this order; and CAUTIONS Adrian Eugene Lacy if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice for non-payment of the filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 10/12/22. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nhc)
|
| Filing 6 Mail Returned from Adrian Eugene Lacy at LaPorte County Jail as Undeliverable - RTS re: copy of docket sheet. (Addres previously updated and copies resent) (nae) |
| Filing 5 Copy of Complaint DE #1 and Order DE #3 sent to Nahas St. address. (nae) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address by Adrian Eugene Lacy from LaPorte County Jail to 609 Nahas St, Michigan City, IN 46360 (nae) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The court GRANTS the plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 ; ORDERS the plaintiff, Adrian Eugene Lacy, IDOC # UNKNOWN, LaPorteCounty Jail # 20950889, to immediately pay (and the facility having custody toautomatically remit) $54.80 to the clerk in payment of the initial partial filing fee; ORDERS the plaintiff to pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTS the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; and DIRECTS the clerk to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 10/04/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party and LaPorte County Jail: Inmate Trust Fund Department)(sej)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Adrian Eugene Lacy. (kmt) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Adult Probation Department, Michigan City Superior Court 1, filed by Adrian Eugene Lacy. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Lacy)(kmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
