Gregory v. Carter et al
| Michael K Gregory |
| Robert E Carter, Jr, Leohr, Jerry Snyder, Jack Hendrix, Dick Brown, Randal Purcell, Charles Dugan, Gillmore, Frank Vanihel, Vanshoryk, Joe and Unknown Internal Investigators |
| 3:2022cv00843 |
| October 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Damon R Leichty |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RECEIPT of Motion to Confirm Receipt of Complaint from Michael K Gregory. (Forwarded to the Southern District case number 2:22-cv-439 for ruling) (nae) |
Filing 4
ORDER transferring case to the Southern District of Indiana. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 10/6/22. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mlc)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Plaintiff Michael K Gregory. (kmt) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Michael K Gregory. (kmt) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Dick Brown, Robert E Carter, Jr, Charles Dugan, Gillmore, Jack Hendrix, Joe, Leohr, Randal Purcell, Jerry Snyder, Unknown Internal Investigators, Frank Vanihel, filed by Michael K Gregory. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Gregory)(kmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
