Morris v. Jayco, Inc.
| Timothy C Morris and Timothy Charles Morris |
| Jayco, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv00861 |
| October 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Damon R Leichty |
| Contract: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Jayco, Inc.'s ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Jayco, Inc..(Foust Hunneshagen, Katlyn) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Jayco, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent THOR Industries Inc for Jayco, Inc... (Foust Hunneshagen, Katlyn) |
Filing 4
ORDER: Defendant to file disclosure statement under Rule 7.1 within 7 days. Text-only order by Judge Damon R Leichty on 10/18/22. (dk)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Katlyn M Foust Hunneshagen on behalf of Jayco, Inc. (Foust Hunneshagen, Katlyn) |
| Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Timothy Charles Morris. Jayco, Inc. waiver sent on 10/11/2022, answer due 12/12/2022. (Wells, Elizabeth) |
| **NEW CASE** Judge Damon R Leichty and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (rmf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Jayco, Inc.( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-5045904.), filed by Timothy C Morris. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons)(Wells, Elizabeth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
