Rodgers v. Hyatte et al
| Charles Rodgers and Charles Rogers |
| William Hyatte, William Hyatt, George Payne, Justin McCray and Amber Goodrich |
| MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only) |
| 3:2022cv00873 |
| October 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: The court GRANTS the plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis #5 ; ORDERS the plaintiff, Charles Rodgers, IDOC # 136164, to immediately pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) $16.70 to the clerk in payment of the initial partial filing fee; ORDERS the plaintiff to pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTS the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; and DIRECTS the clerk to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 10/27/2022. (Copy mailed as directed in Order) (jdb)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Charles Rodgers. (kmt) |
| ***Deficiency Deadline terminated. (kmt) |
| Filing 4 Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by Charles Rodgers. The Prisoner Electronic Filing Program operates pursuant to General Order 2018-1. When an inmate submits a document for electronic filing, the Prison Law Library emails a scanned copy and mails the original to the Court. The inmate should not mail a paper copy to the Court or a Defendant. When the scanned copy is docketed by the Court, a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) is emailed to the Prison Law Library. This NEF is printed by the Prison Law Library and given to the inmate with only the first page of the inmate's filing. Defendants are served by the Court. When the Prison Law Library receives an NEF for an entry by the Court, the NEF and a full copy of any attached order or document is printed and given to the inmate. The Prison Law Library will not print the NEF for documents filed by a Defendant. The Defendant must serve the inmate by mail. (kmt) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The court DENIES the plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 without prejudice; GRANTS the plaintiff until 11/14/2022, to either pay the filing fee or file a renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis that is properly signed and is accompanied by a certified copy of his trust fund ledgers for the past six months; and CAUTIONS him that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case is subject to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 10/13/22. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nhc)
|
| Filing 2 (Unsigned) MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Charles Rodgers. (kmt) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Amber Goodrich, William Hyatte, Justin McCray, George Payne, filed by Charles Rodgers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Cover letter, #3 Envelope)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Rodgers)(kmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
